1 |
Hi Markos, |
2 |
|
3 |
I'm very busy in real life, but I'll try to solve all squid issues this |
4 |
week. |
5 |
Btw, [2] and [3] were solved from net-proxy's perspective and [1] |
6 |
wasn't fixed by upstream AFAIK. |
7 |
|
8 |
Cheers, |
9 |
Alin |
10 |
|
11 |
On 04/08/2010 13:50, Markos Chandras wrote: |
12 |
> Hi there |
13 |
> |
14 |
> net-proxy/squid needs your love. Bug #311927 and Bug #304751 require a |
15 |
> version bump. Our user community did an excellent job there providing an |
16 |
> improved ebuild for that. Furthermore there are several open security |
17 |
> bugs wrt squid [1][2][3][4]. net-proxy herd what is your status? |
18 |
> Security bugs should be your first priority. If you are unable to |
19 |
> maintain certain packages you could ask for help instead of staying |
20 |
> quiet. Maybe we should list this |
21 |
> package as maintainer-needed and request some proxy-maintainers from our |
22 |
> user community. What do you think about that? |
23 |
> |
24 |
> @Council: Yet another example that we need to track the status of every |
25 |
> single project in order to have a clear picture of which projects are |
26 |
> active and which are dead |
27 |
> |
28 |
> @QA: Should step up and commit these ebuilds just to get |
29 |
> rid of the security bugs which, frankly, don't look that good ( distro |
30 |
> wise ). I know technically is not our job, but we need to step up here |
31 |
> and either fix the security bugs since net-proxy can't do that, or mask |
32 |
> this package which is a no-go. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/261208 |
35 |
> [2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/279379 |
36 |
> [3] http://bugs.gentoo.org/279380 |
37 |
> [4] http://bugs.gentoo.org/301828 |
38 |
> |