Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] fix binary debug support, part elevenity billion + 1
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 21:59:28
Message-Id: 1149717321.25264.4.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] fix binary debug support, part elevenity billion + 1 by Alec Warner
1 On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 16:05 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
2
3 > We've discussed this multiple times, and it's always been the conclusion
4 > that per package.env should go in bashrc, as bashrc is generally more
5 > powerful than anything we could devise. The only downside afaik, for
6 > bashrc is that you can't do per package FEATURES as FEATURES is a
7 > python-side var. But you shouldn't need per package FEATURES by design;
8 > FEATURES are for portage, not your ebuild.
9
10
11 This is a thumbs up? I've got the code sitting in my
12 $PORTDIR/profiles/base/profile.bashrc to give us just this.
13 I'd be all to happy to commit it. So that's a yes right? :)
14
15
16 --
17 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
18 Gentoo Linux
19
20 --
21 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies