On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:12:18 +0100
Ulrich Mueller <email@example.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Michał Górny wrote:
> >> What mistakes?
> > The mistake of introducing a pointless separation based on a rule of
> > thumb which becomes more and more blurry over time, and hacking
> > packages just to make it work.
> There's really nothing pointless or blurry about this separation.
> The FHS has a nice definition: "The contents of the root filesystem
> must be adequate to boot, restore, recover, and/or repair the system."
Why don't we have sshd there then? I don't really feel like repairing
remote system without fallback sshd.
And a compiler. If I mess up some important system component, I'd really
use one. And package manager. And backup system libraries...