| 1 |
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:12:18 +0100 |
| 2 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> >>>>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> >> What mistakes? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> > The mistake of introducing a pointless separation based on a rule of |
| 9 |
> > thumb which becomes more and more blurry over time, and hacking |
| 10 |
> > packages just to make it work. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> There's really nothing pointless or blurry about this separation. |
| 13 |
> The FHS has a nice definition: "The contents of the root filesystem |
| 14 |
> must be adequate to boot, restore, recover, and/or repair the system." |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Why don't we have sshd there then? I don't really feel like repairing |
| 17 |
remote system without fallback sshd. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
And a compiler. If I mess up some important system component, I'd really |
| 20 |
use one. And package manager. And backup system libraries... |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Best regards, |
| 24 |
Michał Górny |
Archives