Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@...>
Subject: Re: A Little Council Reform Anyone?
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 06:16:58 +0000 (UTC)
"Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o> posted
4A4D97D5.10407@g.o, excerpted below, on  Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:32:05
+0000:

> I have a few ideas about this that I'll have to put in writing and share
> later, but let me start by proposing that for such a change we require
> the support of at least 2/3 of the devs that vote *and* a minimum of 1/3
> of all devs.
> By requiring the support of at least 1/3 of all devs, we can ensure that
> it won't be possible to have extreme events as getting a policy change
> approved by > 90% of the voting devs which happen to represent < 10% of
> all devs. OTOH, requiring 2/3 of the voting devs might prove to be to
> hard in an election with a high turnout - afaicr we didn't have > 60%
> turnout in any election in at least the last 2 years.

I don't believe that's workable.  See for instance the issues getting the 
Gentoo Foundation's bylaws approved.  A 2/3 super-majority of voting devs 
is fine, but the 1/3 of total devs requirement can be problematic, given 
that some devs simply aren't interested in politics enough to vote at 
all, ever.  We don't want to be in the situation the Foundation was in.  
Now, if the total devs requirement was much lower, say 10%, then maybe, 
but if we're going that low, is it even worth bothering?

So I'd say keep it to a 2/3 super-majority of voting devs, and leave it 
at that.  If people don't what 2/3 of say a 10 % voting minority decided, 
well, they should have voted.  (And if /enough/ people don't like it, 
have another vote and undo it.)

For much the same reasons, tho, I favor the council super-majority idea.  
Certainly, a simple majority changing what is effectively Gentoo's 
constitution is distressingly unstable, but 5/7 is 71%, and if no more 
than two council members can be found to oppose a move that needs to be 
stopped, we're in trouble, regardless.  Plus, they ran for the job, so 
can be considered to be politically active enough to actually vote, 
unlike devs in the general case.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman



References:
A Little Council Reform Anyone?
-- Ned Ludd
Re: [gentoo-council] A Little Council Reform Anyone?
-- Tobias Scherbaum
Re: [gentoo-council] A Little Council Reform Anyone?
-- Alec Warner
Re: [gentoo-council] A Little Council Reform Anyone?
-- Tobias Scherbaum
Re: [gentoo-council] A Little Council Reform Anyone?
-- Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: [gentoo-council] A Little Council Reform Anyone?
Next by thread:
Re: [gentoo-council] A Little Council Reform Anyone?
Previous by date:
Re: A Little Council Reform Anyone?
Next by date:
Re: Gentoo Council Elections Results for term 2009/2010


Updated Nov 07, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.