1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 05/05/2012 08:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
5 |
> On Sat, 5 May 2012 20:40:47 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel" |
6 |
> <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
> |
8 |
>> there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with |
9 |
>> the help of an eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to |
10 |
>> get some of them into the portage tree. Now we have to decide |
11 |
>> where to put them. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> Suggestion: new category office-ext |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> What do you think? |
16 |
> |
17 |
> office-plugins, to follow suit. |
18 |
> |
19 |
This may be confusing as people would expect these plugins to work |
20 |
with both {open,libre}office packages. If these plugins are just for |
21 |
libreoffice then I would prefer app-libreoffice like other people have |
22 |
already suggested |
23 |
|
24 |
- -- |
25 |
Regards, |
26 |
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 |
27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
28 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
29 |
|
30 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPpZiCAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCEP8P/227xkNXoZU0x7Oupk98JHzr |
31 |
QwEQD4S41UeoZlxpq1JjioJszSuoQBgoiF3KpPB/dBMJb5vbqJDMuXVvJTPTleY6 |
32 |
6XzEcux0lZjEgy3r4vZMbN4IfXkPvSF1T/FWGrb+OCNXkTNiRAd1i7lqy22RcalE |
33 |
NQW7MNvZlnUUxCdoL9EbcSizaZS62kOUJr7xIgsYkecietKZLtlMhalkolWT8GVG |
34 |
1i8vrbvx0T7y+9kihoQ7DhRgPx1p/mm6BnNcrcqhuEVJysNIKyXyjR3hgyVubz6j |
35 |
ItGCH2dNN8lr8CzcnqlMl+QiMWtuo8OKB6X+ImaSg8nHECQurO/4acw+4BJuJ2u8 |
36 |
p0RU9iCU4UzMOzj8vnxKDjZbz6By0qgn0/WXEz9r5sYs5oKXpuaB64UwQIWXTQfb |
37 |
bMi7ZQSoV7Z7SjgB4IH3cdfCGEaNDddfl34ExmUyoOgV8hzl2KHtQTmGGH++jR/5 |
38 |
n09X1C1c9xhSC8jVHke7ot1zSFEunzHheuXOWGpR7+xL2mBbK3uCaaKW6hmCis78 |
39 |
plZqQuVdCNr5FAsVATOGBIZsty+/HZgNug0cfyp+VMNoNXV0n0oatiYRZBLJaYW0 |
40 |
MB/e8V3SHFotWmBfZapXxOYmKosQ/xKLTXS0UUyvFaW9fngJCuQPQPWhW/EhFZ7q |
41 |
e+fO6Naq9rx6RJ5SYggP |
42 |
=6GG+ |
43 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |