Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego Elio “Flameeyes” Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××.com>
To: Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, patrick@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rewritten epatch
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:34:33
Message-Id: 1261226013.8288.29.camel@yamato
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rewritten epatch by Brian Harring
1 Il giorno ven, 18/12/2009 alle 23.56 -0800, Brian Harring ha scritto:
2 >
3 > For changes of this sort, abusing the tinderboxes to get a real world
4 > test run makes a lot of sense.
5
6 I can put it into run with the tinderbox, no problem with that.
7
8 But I think that we should really use both: Patrick's should be better
9 for I/O so maybe you (or Zac) can come up with a script to just try
10 unpack and prepare phases for all ebuilds rather than keeping the whole
11 merge…
12
13 --
14 Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes”
15 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
16
17 If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is,
18 it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] rewritten epatch Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rewritten epatch Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rewritten epatch Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>