>>>>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> Did I get it right, you are thinking about a special EAPI only for
>> user patches? I'd say that the feature is not important enough to
>> justify that.
> Didn't we have a few other cheap things lined up?
Yes we do, and IMHO it would make much more sense if EAPI 5 would
(And of course, there are still the two features that were omitted
from EAPI 4, namely slot-operator-deps and profile-iuse-injection.)