| 1 |
El vie, 05-03-2010 a las 22:06 +0100, Ben de Groot escribió: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> > If no, I can split off utils from poppler - with CMake it's effortless. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> We just rejoined the split poppler into one package again. So if you |
| 6 |
> are going to split it up again, you will have some explaining to do to |
| 7 |
> our users. I would like to prevent splitting, and see if we can fix maybe |
| 8 |
> the cups ebuild instead. Or maybe the gtk+ maintainers want to split |
| 9 |
> up their package... I understand they like that sort of thing. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Cheers, |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I think that it will be easy to explain users that we *need* to split |
| 14 |
poppler and poppler-utils to prevent circular dependencies. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
About splitting others... well, sometime ago I saw that cups is being |
| 17 |
split in Arch (having cups and libcups) when trying to investigate how |
| 18 |
to deal with avahi -> gtk+ -> cups -> avahi circular dep problems (bug |
| 19 |
222601), but I don't know if it could help with this case and how much |
| 20 |
work would it require :-/ |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Best regards |
Archives