List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Rich Freeman <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Well, only Robin can explain exactly what he meant, but it sounds like
> we don't want the committer field to ever have a non-gentoo email in
> it, and signatures should be gentoo as well. So, if a dev just
> applies a patch to their tree/etc then there is no issue (just set
> author). If a dev wants to actually pull in a commit they'd need to
> edit the fields accordingly and re-sign it. Not sure offhand how to
> best do that (I assume it is possible - probably with some variation
> on rebase or something rebase calls).
Well, it doesn't seem like a big deal IF there's an explicit merge
commit that's signed by a dev.