On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Samuli Suominen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 10/13/2011 02:27 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger schrieb:
>>>> The removed qutecom ebuild was not broken at any time.
>>> by splitting my reply, you changed the meaning. having qutecom in the tree
>>> with a depend on versions that i'm now removing breaks the depgraph.
>> The depgraph is broken after the old versions are removed, not before.
> I'm not sure if you should have gentoo-x86 access anymore... This is scary.
Come on. That's ridiculous, and nothing but trolling. Don't do that.
Like in the pngcrush thread, miscommunications all around.