1 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 04:48:56 +0200 |
2 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > There was a change in wording to better convey the original intent. |
4 |
> > There was no change in behaviour. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> There was a change in behavior of 'nonfatal |
7 |
> eclass_function_which_sometimes_calls_die'. |
8 |
|
9 |
No there wasn't. The behaviour specified by PMS both before and after |
10 |
the patch remains exactly the same. The only thing the patch did was |
11 |
make the wording much clearer, so people can no longer make the |
12 |
(perfectly understandble) misinterpretation of the intent that you have |
13 |
made. |
14 |
|
15 |
-- |
16 |
Ciaran McCreesh |