| 1 |
James Potts wrote: |
| 2 |
> There is a problem here for the java folks...Technically, their |
| 3 |
> migration-overlay is an overlay, and technically, that overlay is |
| 4 |
> currently unofficial. Therefore, technically, if it is against the |
| 5 |
> rules for projects and/or devs to use bugzilla for unofficial |
| 6 |
> overlays, then it is against the rules for the java team to use |
| 7 |
> bugzilla for their migration-overlay. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> As for the fact that the migration overlay is in the process of being |
| 10 |
> moved to o.g.o, "in the process of" doesn't mean it's already been |
| 11 |
> done, and until it's finished, the above statement stands. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Props *and* apologies to the java team for this, but it looks like you |
| 14 |
> need to move the overlay *before* you finish the migration process |
| 15 |
> now. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Question is, do we care about blindly following a policy that obviously was |
| 18 |
targetting at something completely different, or do we care about getting stuff |
| 19 |
done? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
There's nothing as unproductive as political correctness. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Just my 0.02 SFr, |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Kind Regards, |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Simon Stelling |
| 29 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives