| 1 |
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 19:23 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Can we have another Sunrise discussion please? I would love to have some |
| 5 |
> feedback about Sunrise, about our progress and where we are still lacking. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
What exactly is there to "discuss" about this? It is not an official |
| 8 |
project anymore, so the council really has no bearing on it. I'm |
| 9 |
guessing you would like for it to become an official project. If I were |
| 10 |
asked, some of the things I would bring up are: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
What has the existence of Sunrise done for Gentoo? What new packages |
| 13 |
are now in the tree because of it? What new developers have been |
| 14 |
recruited because of it? What packages that were previously without |
| 15 |
maintainers in the tree have found maintainers due to Sunrise? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I think you fail to see that for something like Sunrise to prove itself |
| 18 |
as a viable Gentoo project, it has to actually accomplish some of its |
| 19 |
stated goals. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
That being said, if the council wants to discuss it, they're more than |
| 22 |
welcome to. I just personally feel it wouldn't be time well spent. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 26 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
| 27 |
x86 Architecture Team |
| 28 |
Games - Developer |
| 29 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives