| 1 |
On 2/15/11 9:10 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: |
| 2 |
> I don't think making a list for each arch is going to make anything any |
| 3 |
> easier for maintainers requesting stabilization, which means those list |
| 4 |
> we need more time to generate before being released. You just move the |
| 5 |
> problem to another place. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I was expecting such argument. It's a good point, but please consider |
| 8 |
the following: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
- if the stabilization list has been created automatically, we should |
| 11 |
adjust the tool to print in a format more suitable for the intended |
| 12 |
audience (arch developers) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
- if the stabilization list has been created manually, what prevents you |
| 15 |
from doing it in a slightly different way? I think it doesn't change the |
| 16 |
amount of work, and might even decrease it (no need for pretty tables) |
Archives