Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: java@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla usage for overlays' projects [was: sunrise, a temporary compromise]
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:53:55
Message-Id: 449BF94F.6000104@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla usage for overlays' projects [was: sunrise, a temporary compromise] by Alec Warner
1 Alec Warner wrote:
2 > I believe that jakub finds this devrel decision a step out of bounds
3 > (not sure if anyone else detected the that in his statement) and saying
4 > that to the java folks is moreso a way of pointing out just how silly it
5 > is :) I mean if he was serious, he would have addressed the PHP
6 > overlay, the webapps overlay...etc...
7
8 No, because those are now hosted by Gentoo.
9
10 > Look, I was on IRC yesterday, the whole thing was a mess. For once I'm
11 > not going to step on devrels balls for this one. Someone had to do
12 > something. For once I'm tired of *someone acting* and then getting
13 > nailed for it because its not their place. Am I thrilled with the
14 > outcome? No not really. Apparently neither is Jakub. Thats all fine.
15 > Can always overturn it later. Or we can discuss it endlessly here with
16 > no outcome, or we can make the council decide on what the proper use of
17 > bugzilla is. Or we can all realize that we can't get our way all the
18 > time and compromise with other projects*.
19
20 Yes, but as Seemant said, all those affected in the decision should be
21 involved (or at least represented) in the compromise.
22
23 Thanks,
24 Donnie

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies