| 1 |
Sergey Kuleshov <sergey@××××××××××.com> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Hi! |
| 4 |
> Can someone explain me, what is the reason to have xemacs and xemacs-gtk as |
| 5 |
> two different packages? Why not add a check for gtk flag in the main xemacs |
| 6 |
> ebuild? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Thanks |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> -- |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I can't quite remember... but I think this was a historical thing. |
| 13 |
GTK+ support in Emacs was added to Emacs in the 21.4 series (or was |
| 14 |
it a fork of 21.4). Then later, support for 21.4 in general was |
| 15 |
added to portage. So yes, it is a bit messy, and I do agree that it |
| 16 |
should be based on the gtk USE flag. If you're savvy, create a patch |
| 17 |
and post it to http://bugs.gentoo.org. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Matt |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Matthew Kennedy |
| 22 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives