| 1 |
On Thursday 10 April 2003 23:49, Dan Armak wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 10 April 2003 22:39, Dan Armak wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Hi Paul, |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > I was planning to do something to support gpg-agent generically for kmail |
| 6 |
> > "after the 1.4 release", as it's a pretty big change. Since you've beat |
| 7 |
> > me |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> to |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> > it though :-), I'll look at your changes and if I like it will put it |
| 12 |
> > this weekend into ~ profiles. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Um, I wrote that without thinking enough and without having looked at the |
| 15 |
> patches. They are to xfree and gdm; I didn't imply I'd touch either of |
| 16 |
> those packages without an ok from the maintainers. I will look at the whole |
| 17 |
> thing though. (Still haven't.) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
That's why it is a request for comments. I know it are patches to rather |
| 20 |
central parts, and (except for the newpg patch) they are only useful when |
| 21 |
used together. I basically made the patches myself because I felt there is a |
| 22 |
need for this kind of feature, and there had not been real reactions on my |
| 23 |
suggestions. I thought the best way to convince people of the use is to show |
| 24 |
what I mean and what it does. But these patches do impose an architectural |
| 25 |
change, so I wouldn't be at all surprised if people prefer other ways of |
| 26 |
reaching the same goal. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Paul |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 32 |
Researcher |
| 33 |
Mail: pauldv@××××××.nl |
| 34 |
Homepage: http://www.cs.kun.nl/~pauldv |
Archives