Archives
Archives
| From: | Vlastimil Babka <caster@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 52 - GLEP 23 revisited | ||
| Date: | Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:06:45 | ||
| Message-Id: | 45116661.8060907@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 52 - GLEP 23 revisited by Michael Cummings |
||
| 1 | Michael Cummings wrote: |
| 2 | > This doesn't make sense to me. I have a copy of every license used in |
| 3 | > the portage tree already in /usr/portage/licenses - why dup that again? |
| 4 | > We already have an existing LICENSE keywording in the ebuilds, why not |
| 5 | > just focus on patching portage to allow a make.conf variable for allowed |
| 6 | > licenses and block based on that? |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | |
| 9 | +1 |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Vlastimil Babka (Caster) |
| 13 | Gentoo/Java |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |