| 1 |
John Brooks wrote: |
| 2 |
> Random idea: How about a different bug assignee for maintainer-needed |
| 3 |
> packages with provided ebuilds/patches? Either something generic, or |
| 4 |
> try to go for something more category/package specific (herds, etc). |
| 5 |
> Lots of work for bugwranglers, though. There is a huge difference to |
| 6 |
> developers between an unmaintained package with no progress and just |
| 7 |
> looking over an ebuild that has been used successfully by several |
| 8 |
> people. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
No need for an additional mail/bugzie alias here, we could simply use a |
| 11 |
KEYWORD like the existing 'Inclusion' (which isn't used that much for |
| 12 |
now, 63 open bugs have that keyword) or a new 'HasPatch' as a |
| 13 |
counterpart for 'NeedPatch'. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Tobias |
Archives