From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?) | ||
Date: | Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:02:55 | ||
Message-Id: | 20090905160245.54564214@snowcone | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?) by Maciej Mrozowski |
1 | On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:03:25 +0200 |
2 | Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@××××××.fm> wrote: |
3 | > > Why not use EAPI 4 to make sure people have done that homework then? |
4 | > |
5 | > Because it won't make *upstream* do their homework. |
6 | |
7 | If upstream won't tell you the licence under which something is |
8 | distributed, how does Gentoo know whether it's allowed to mirror source |
9 | tarballs or include the package on binary CDs? |
10 | |
11 | -- |
12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |