1 |
On 03/13/2012 06:42 PM, Brian Harring wrote: |
2 |
> Leaving it such that the PM has to enforce things like "don't have |
3 |
> multiple EAPI assignments" means by default, one of them isn't going |
4 |
> to... leading to the ebuilds breaking... specifically the common case |
5 |
> being the ebuild becoming acclimated to some quirk of portage. |
6 |
|
7 |
My intention is for PMS to specify the search algorithm that's used to |
8 |
probe the EAPI, and also for it to specify that package managers must |
9 |
treat an ebuild as invalid if the probed EAPI is not identical to the |
10 |
one that's obtained from bash. If all package managers adhere strictly |
11 |
to these two requirements, then we won't have any incompatibilities |
12 |
between package managers here. |
13 |
-- |
14 |
Thanks, |
15 |
Zac |