| 1 |
On 03/13/2012 06:42 PM, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
> Leaving it such that the PM has to enforce things like "don't have |
| 3 |
> multiple EAPI assignments" means by default, one of them isn't going |
| 4 |
> to... leading to the ebuilds breaking... specifically the common case |
| 5 |
> being the ebuild becoming acclimated to some quirk of portage. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
My intention is for PMS to specify the search algorithm that's used to |
| 8 |
probe the EAPI, and also for it to specify that package managers must |
| 9 |
treat an ebuild as invalid if the probed EAPI is not identical to the |
| 10 |
one that's obtained from bash. If all package managers adhere strictly |
| 11 |
to these two requirements, then we won't have any incompatibilities |
| 12 |
between package managers here. |
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Thanks, |
| 15 |
Zac |
Archives