Archives
Archives
| From: | Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected | ||
| Date: | Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:43:22 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200807271839.24347.Arfrever.FTA@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected by Jeremy Olexa |
||
| 1 | 2008-07-27 05:45:29 Jeremy Olexa napisał(a): |
| 2 | > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: |
| 3 | > > It will at least allow QA team to fix such bugs where patches are already |
| 4 | > > available. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > So, if bugs are being fixed |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Not all of them. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | > Are bugs being ignored or RESOLVED, WONTFIX? |
| 11 | |
| 12 | These bugs which aren't fixed are usually ignored. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | > Hypothetically, if there was such a policy and there was 100's of bugs |
| 15 | > filed with patches (maintainers should handle the patches anyway) this |
| 16 | > isn't any different than the present lack of policy. Let us also pretend |
| 17 | > that there were 100's of bugs filed that had no such patches |
| 18 | > available..would the QA team have the manpower to generate patches to |
| 19 | > fix this and apply them or would the bugs just rot in bugzilla and not |
| 20 | > achieve anything? |
| 21 | |
| 22 | Such bugs usually get fixed. |
| 23 | https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=regexp&short_desc=%28ignore%7Crespect%29.*LDFLAGS&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED |
| 24 | |
| 25 | -- |
| 26 | Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |