Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:05:50 +0200
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@...> wrote:
> In that regard, git is nothing like for instance svn, where branches come
> at a much higher cost, as does merging between them.

That's wrong. SVN branches are just about as cheap as git branches,
although merges used to be much more painful. I'm not sure how good
merging in recent SVN is.

Let's please stay a little on-topic? The migration will get there much
faster if we don't succumb to feature creep.

Cheers,

Dirkjan


Replies:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Kent Fredric
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Ciaran McCreesh
References:
Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dan Douglas
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dan Douglas
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Previous by date:
Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: freebsd.eclass
Next by date:
Re: Do we need games group and all that game prefixes?


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.