On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 10:03:10PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
> >> And this is where the second GLEP comes in:
> >>     http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-xsd.html
> > Don't remove the DTD DOCTYPE line. Leave it there.
> > Let simple tools be able to use the DTD to validate the well-formedness,
> > then upgrade to the XSD to check the actual semantics of the file.
> Very good point, thanks. But the changes of GLEP 46 can't be validated
> without allowing the "status" attribute for the toplevel maintainer. But I
> guess we could do it as long as it's documented (and commented) correctly.
Sure. In other places where DTD->XSD migrations have been done, there
ARE still changes made to the DTD for new elements/attributes etc.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy
E-Mail     : robbat2@g.o
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85