Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On May 9, 2003 21:31, Norberto BENSA wrote:
> nbensa@venkman ~ $ date ; echo ${Spundun Bhatt}
> Friday 09 May 2003 08:47 pm
>
> > Why is glibc built againt a package called linux-headers? Must be a very
> > elementary question.... but since we have the entire source with us...
> > why is glibc not using that ? and using instead extra package of
> > headers?
>
> 'cos it needs to know about the architecture it is being installed.
>
> Is your box x86, ppc, sparc, mips, arm? How does it handle byte-order? How
> long is an int? Your chars are signed or unsigned?
I have to agree it seems kind of silly to have linux-headers if you already
have *-sources.. I mean the rest of gentoo is so cleanly done, this doesnt
seem to fit... linux-headers shouldnt even exist!:)
Hmmm.. couldn't the bootstrap process build against linux-headers, then when
you get to the part in the install that you have to build a kernel, unmerge
linux-headers and setup all the proper symlinks to /usr/src/linux after the
user emerged a kernel... or perhaps have the user d/l the kernel source
before the bootstrap.. or maybe someone else has a solution
CC:ing gentoo-dev.. I'd really like to know if this is feasible
DISCLAIMER: im not a hardcore C developer, so maybe I'm just not getting why
this wouldn't work
- --
Mike Wojcikiewicz
CodeCrew
mike@...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+vS5TzK7WDkEewTARAlh0AJ9KPZkqT+UdMwAvhOhk3FgACg9iegCdE50U
XF7aWX5jh31HE8i27KGv24I=
=Mpk/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
|
|