1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 04/05/12 11:37, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
5 |
> On 5/4/12 8:21 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
6 |
>> My 2 cents: The Chromium project really doesn't have any motivation to |
7 |
>> make it optional since their end product is Google Chrome and they |
8 |
>> target a given version of Ubuntu. I think a patch to make them |
9 |
>> optional might be accepted, but it probably isn't going to happen |
10 |
>> otherwise. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Another point is that too many USE flags for such a big and complex |
13 |
> package as www-client/chromium would make testing much much harder, and |
14 |
> create many configurations upstream would not support. |
15 |
|
16 |
I'll check with upstream if that would be a huge problem for them, we |
17 |
have 6 useflags and we'd bump them to 8. Firefox has twice of them. |
18 |
|
19 |
If nobody else wants to I could have a look and see how hard is to make |
20 |
that nicer for our non-udev/non-dbus users on linux. |
21 |
|
22 |
lu |
23 |
|
24 |
- -- |
25 |
|
26 |
Luca Barbato |
27 |
Gentoo/linux |
28 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
29 |
|
30 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
31 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) |
32 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
33 |
|
34 |
iEYEARECAAYFAk+kMHwACgkQ6Ex4woTpDjTTAgCfXtMJFJjB5ZH08u0Nb7yKmkqv |
35 |
/GwAoNejWgUcHaMWnD6e8Bgr/+V/cYDA |
36 |
=CCQe |
37 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |