| 1 |
Ryan, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I took a look at the problem cited in your bug report. I suggest |
| 4 |
compiling sys-boot/grub with CFLAGS="-O0 -ggdb3", attaching gdb to |
| 5 |
grub-install and then watching what happens in the debugger. If you |
| 6 |
compare runs with a GCC 4.5.3 built stage2 and a GCC 4.6.2 built |
| 7 |
stage2, you should be able to find the bug. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Yours truly, |
| 10 |
Richard Yao |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
| 13 |
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100 |
| 14 |
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>> I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are |
| 17 |
>> preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near |
| 18 |
>> stabilization)? |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> I have read hardmask message but it simply explains that it's masked for |
| 21 |
>> testing purposes :-/ |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Grub is the only blocker. I don't want to unmask something that makes |
| 24 |
> people's systems unbootable. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> I'm also out of ideas and open to suggestions. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> -- |
| 30 |
> fonts, gcc-porting |
| 31 |
> toolchain, wxwidgets |
| 32 |
> @ gentoo.org |
Archives