List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Wednesday 30 May 2012 17:41:18 Peter Stuge wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > Fedora rawhide and ArchLinux switched to libusbx and followed
> > > suit in our virtual/libusb:1.
> > sad that we can't get these things merged. maybe we need to
> > convince dsd to hand over the reigns ?
> It seems that some don't know that dsd made me co-maintainer in
> libusb some months after he created the 1.0.8 release.
> I've been working hard on libusb since before 1.0.8. I joined libusb
> in 2004 and was already asked by Johannes (the 0.1 author) to be
> maintainer in 2007, but declined.
> The fork is a long story. I commented in the Arch ticket for their
> switch, and the libusbx lead maintainer replied there today. I also
> had a chat with Samuli and firstname.lastname@example.org on IRC about keeping libusb
> as the default provider for virtual/libusb:1.
> I'm working on a blog post with what I think are some key facts for
> everyone with an interest in the libusb API. The fork is, like the
> libusb-1.0.9 release, a month old, and of course there was a sudden
> surge in activity when Hans (Fedora libusb package maintainer and
> now libusbx maintainer) blogged about the fork, which I wasn't quite
> prepared for. Hold on, more information coming shortly.
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)