Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr vs. initramfs redux
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:56:54
Message-Id: robbat2-20110810T215352-364888349Z@orbis-terrarum.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr vs. initramfs redux by William Hubbs
1 On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:57:30PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
2 > Sorry, I should have been more clear here. Mounting /var doesn't fill up
3 > the root partition, but if you don't want to use the initramfs, this
4 > means that /var must also exist on the root partition, which can create
5 > more of a concern for filling the root partition than putting /usr on
6 > the root partition creates.
7 That's a problem for the users, not the initramfs. The initramfs
8 supports /usr, /var and anything else as noted. Having /var on / is a
9 perfectly valid choice for certain situations. The problem of filling up
10 / is PEBKAC primarily, and can happen equally for / (think /root), /usr
11 on /, /var on /.
12
13 --
14 Robin Hugh Johnson
15 Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead
16 E-Mail : robbat2@g.o
17 GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr vs. initramfs redux "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr vs. initramfs redux Eray Aslan <eras@g.o>