| 1 |
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Wulf C. Krueger <wk@×××××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> between both. This strengthening bridge of understanding can be seen in dev- |
| 4 |
>> zero's move to appoint ciaranm as his proxy for today's council meeting. |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Sorry to rain on your parade, but with ciaranm's consistent history, |
| 8 |
> allowing him to participate in Gentoo's discussions itself is a |
| 9 |
> privilege of patience on the part of the Gentoo community. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I would believe that recent history would show the opposite. There seem |
| 13 |
to be a group of developers at which the mere mention of ciaranm results |
| 14 |
in setting them off. Regardless of the technical merits of a solution |
| 15 |
they seem more interested in just derailing anything that might have |
| 16 |
anything to do with ciaramn. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I realise that ciaranm has had a nasty past. But recently I haven't see |
| 19 |
anything. I for one hope that this continues and that other members of |
| 20 |
the community take a look at themselves before spouting about the evils |
| 21 |
of ciaramn. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> Allowing him to proxy in a council meeting is both disallowed |
| 24 |
> (non-gentoo devs cannot be on the council), and reflects badly on the |
| 25 |
> candidate in question (dev-zero). |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
Not shared by everyone. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> -- |
| 31 |
> ~Nirbheek Chauhan |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
Archives