Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Wulf C. Krueger <wk@...> wrote:
>> between both. This strengthening bridge of understanding can be seen in dev-
>> zero's move to appoint ciaranm as his proxy for today's council meeting.
>>
> 
> Sorry to rain on your parade, but with ciaranm's consistent history,
> allowing him to participate in Gentoo's discussions itself is a
> privilege of patience on the part of the Gentoo community.
> 

I would believe that recent history would show the opposite.  There seem
to be a group of developers at which the mere mention of ciaranm results
in setting them off.  Regardless of the technical merits of a solution
they seem more interested in just derailing anything that might have
anything to do with ciaramn.

I realise that ciaranm has had a nasty past.  But recently I haven't see
anything.  I for one hope that this continues and that other members of
the community take a look at themselves before spouting about the evils
of ciaramn.

> Allowing him to proxy in a council meeting is both disallowed
> (non-gentoo devs cannot be on the council), and reflects badly on the
> candidate in question (dev-zero).
> 
Not shared by everyone.

> 
> --
> ~Nirbheek Chauhan
> 
>