On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 14:23 +0100, Markus Nigbur wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 14:00 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 13:38:53 +0100
> > Fabian Zeindl <fabian.zeindl@...> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi
> > > 
> > > I startet a discussion a time ago about new use flag explanations in
> > > ebuilds:
> > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/618
> > > 
> > > Can anyone tell me whether this is going to be implemented?
> > 
> > As I said, this has to be done in metadata.xml (and not in ebuilds) and
> > so far the DTD isn't changed. Paul, any news on this?
> > 
> > Marius
> > 
> 
> That's one of those things that should be easy to establish and result
> in a huge benefit for everyone. I'd probably the first who hacks
> detailed descriptions for every flag my maintained packages have.
> 
> If the only thing that prevents the implementation from being realized,
> is lack of time or lack of man power, feel free to contact me.
> 

Sounds more like a PITA to me, but I wont object out of that
principal :]


-- 
Martin Schlemmer
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
Cape Town, South Africa



-- 
---------------------[ Ciphire Signature ]----------------------
From: azarah@g.o signed email body (911 characters)
Date: on 09 March 2005 at 17:10:07 UTC
To:   gentoo-dev@g.o
----------------------------------------------------------------
: Ciphire has secured this email against identity theft.
: Free download at www.ciphire.com. The garbled lines
: below are the sender's verifiable digital signature.
----------------------------------------------------------------
00fAAAAAEAAADvLS9CjwMAAJwCAAIAAgACACB7uSEw2LFL3NuryZGYWUsof7Q/tx
E4+O9JsxJt/XxMogEAZGGYatxzZc1MLH8GOZZyfMg+7EkaltudrG0sKpmA8UIHm/
QDEMHaJ3IfyvY5QoKPUc7trl3FBhFiXwni0Fsrjg==
------------------[ End Ciphire Signed Message ]----------------

--
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list