Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Hans de Graaff <graaff@g.o>
Subject: Re: About what would be included in EAPI5
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:21:55 +0200
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 13:35 +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Hans de Graaff wrote:
> > > I think ABI fits well though? The situation is that A DEPENDs on B,
> > > and at some point B changes in a way that A must be rebuilt in order
> > > to run - right?
> > 
> > At least for dev-ruby/nokogiri this is not the case. It checks the
> > version of libxml2 it was built against versus the one it finds at
> > runtime and starts to issue warnings if they don't match, but it will
> > still run.
> 
> Why does nokogiri issue warnings about something that isn't actually
> a problem?

I haven't asked upstream, but my guess is that they are trying to be
helpful by letting you run against new versions because this usually
works out. rmagick is taking the alternative approach.

> > dev-ruby/rmagick does something similar for imagemagick but
> > actually refuses to run, even if the ABI would stay the same.
> 
> ruby y u so weird?

Well, it seems to me that you have to pick one of these two solutions as
the sane one, or you must provide lock-step releases that refuse to
build against untested new versions, which means locking in your users.

Hans
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
References:
Re: About what would be included in EAPI5
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: About what would be included in EAPI5
-- Pacho Ramos
Re: About what would be included in EAPI5
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: About what would be included in EAPI5
-- Pacho Ramos
Re: About what would be included in EAPI5
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: About what would be included in EAPI5
-- Pacho Ramos
Re: About what would be included in EAPI5
-- Peter Stuge
Re: About what would be included in EAPI5
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: About what would be included in EAPI5
-- Peter Stuge
Re: About what would be included in EAPI5
-- Hans de Graaff
Re: About what would be included in EAPI5
-- Peter Stuge
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: About what would be included in EAPI5
Next by thread:
Re: About what would be included in EAPI5
Previous by date:
Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2012-06-17 23h59 UTC
Next by date:
Re: [RFC] Dynamic SLOTs


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.