| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Thursday 25 March 2004 11:00, Toby Dickenson wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Thursday 25 March 2004 09:39, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 6 |
> > Especially as we don't |
| 7 |
> > want to limit who may commit where. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Short term, of course thats true. Long term, surely this is a critical |
| 10 |
> part of managing an increasingly large number of developers by |
| 11 |
> controlling the scope of damage that can be caused by compromise of |
| 12 |
> *one* key / or one rogue developer. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> > In some cases it is actually |
| 15 |
> > essential that certain parties (managers) perform fast commits on a |
| 16 |
> > package they are not normally involved with. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> certain parties, sure. do all developers need this? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
For certain parties would allready require a circumvention mechanism. As |
| 21 |
you don't maintain a central list this would be troublesome and make |
| 22 |
your proposal much more complicated than needed. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Paul |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
- -- |
| 27 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 28 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 29 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 30 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
| 31 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 32 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
iD8DBQFAYsmgbKx5DBjWFdsRAqacAJsEtfW09gvjP/1Xrz9Kgm2p6rvRgQCgv1Nv |
| 35 |
2injDOrud7HnLxo1MCvg3kM= |
| 36 |
=FQGj |
| 37 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives