Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Steven J Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Moving more hardening features to default?
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 01:10:05
Message-Id: j8aav8$16f$1@dough.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Moving more hardening features to default? by "Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)"
1 Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote:
2 > El 23/10/11 05:56, Steven J Long escribió:
3 >> Will we be able to switch off SSP via config, or will we have to setup
4 >> our own profile?
5 > This should do the trick:
6 > CFLAGS=$CFLAGS -fno-stack-protector
7
8 Well, with quotes ;) but yeah that's what I was after; just something I
9 can add somewhere in make.conf.
10
11 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
12 > In my proposal the SSP would be off by default on non-hardened profiles,
13 > at least initially. At any time I'd like it to be switchable via
14 > gcc-config, as it currently is on hardened.
15
16 That sounds good too; I'll use the default and then add -fstack-protector
17 to package.env should I ever want to compile a package like that. (In case
18 it sounds like I don't care about security, it's just that I don't like
19 stack canaries, and feel address-space randomization via -fPIE will make
20 the classic return-address subversion pretty difficult. Of course I might
21 be missing something again, but I'm not administering a server.)
22
23 Thanks for your replies, and all the hard work you do.
24 Regards,
25 igli.
26 --
27 #friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but we're not /that/ friendly ;-)