Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: John Ziniti <jziniti@×××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] New cvs.eclass
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 18:36:48
Message-Id: 3EA054BD.60000@speakeasy.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] New cvs.eclass by Dan Armak
1 Dan Armak wrote:
2
3 >On Friday 18 April 2003 14:27, Peter Ruskin wrote:
4 >
5 >
6 >>On Friday 18 Apr 2003 15:21, Dan Armak wrote:
7 >>
8 >>
9 >>>Sorry... for some reason when I sign messages with files attached the
10 >>>sig becomes bad. Maybe something's wrong with kmail.
11 >>>
12 >>>
13 >>Dan, your signature was fine here for all 3 emails.
14 >>
15 >>
16 >
17 >Then it was probably kmail thinking it was bad for some reason... Maybe the
18 >infamous whitespace/underscore bug again, though I haven't seen it for a long
19 >time now.
20 >
21 >
22 >
23 Possibly -- I don't know what the kmail bug is, but with Mozilla 1.3, your
24 first two emails were "gpg: BAD SIGNATURE" and the third one was
25 fine.
26
27 Just my $0.02,
28
29 JZ
30
31
32 --
33 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] New cvs.eclass Norberto BENSA <nbensa@×××.net>