Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 13:55, Joshua Brindle wrote:
> The following packages have an selinux policy in portage (in sec-policy)
> but the associated package doesn't depend on it. I'm looking for
> either an "Ok, I'll do this" or "you go ahead" from each maintainer, thanks.
To be specific, it goes in the RDEPEND. For example, distcc has this in
its RDEPEND:
selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-distcc )
--
Chris PeBenito
<pebenito@g.o>
Developer,
Hardened Gentoo Linux
Embedded Gentoo Linux
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE6AF9243
Key fingerprint = B0E6 877A 883F A57A 8E6A CB00 BC8E E42D E6AF 9243
|
| Attachment: |
|
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
|
|
