1 |
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:54:06 +0200 |
2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:22:16 +0300 |
5 |
> Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> > On 10/09/2011 11:15 πμ, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
8 |
> > > For example, in IRC, willikins tries to look up the members of |
9 |
> > > "no-herd" when you do !meta -v because the bot lacks a special |
10 |
> > > exception for this odd-ball value. |
11 |
> > Just because willikins behaves like that does not justify the |
12 |
> > removal of this tag. God knows how many utilites and scripts are |
13 |
> > out there using the no-herd tag from metadata. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> There's, of course, metadata.dtd too but repoman re-fetches it on |
16 |
> a regular basis so that's no problem. |
17 |
|
18 |
Ah, my bad. Our metadata DTD doesn't enforce existence of any <herd/> |
19 |
tag. Neither does repoman. So, it's just that one webpage which says |
20 |
there must be one. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Best regards, |
24 |
Michał Górny |