Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:16:08
Message-Id: CADPrc80ARXHahkCW-QHvLRzhqgW7MpPwDxYcxNFZgQ7OZQa7AA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181 by Walter Dnes
1 On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:43 AM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote:
2 > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 09:53:25PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote
3 >
4 >> Perhaps a suggestion for the news item.  I'd recommend that anybody
5 >> who needs an initramfs to mount /usr get that working BEFORE they
6 >> upgrade udev.  This situation is a heck of a lot easier to figure out
7 >> if the system still can be booted when the initramfs doesn't work.
8 >
9 >  Question... does it have to be an initramfs, or can the vast majority
10 > of simple cases be handled by a simple initscript in /bin or /sbin that
11 > mounts /usr, and does whatever else is required, before handing off
12 > control to /sbin/init.
13 >
14 >  I've migrated to mdev, so I won't be seeing this problem, but a simple
15 > solution that works for 95% of users might be the way to go.  For the
16 > more complex situations, an initramfs will be necessary.
17
18 The devs are already discussing moving /bin/* to /usr/bin/* (if I
19 understood correctly), so this will not last.
20
21 And besides, genkernel and dracut are automatized; they *are* the
22 simple (and proper, IMHO) solution.
23
24 Regards.
25 --
26 Canek Peláez Valdés
27 Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
28 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181 Joshua Kinard <kumba@g.o>