| 1 |
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:11:31 -0400 |
| 2 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > > by that token, i'll go ahead and remove glibc's static libraries |
| 5 |
> > > since upstream doesn't even support static linking |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > I'm probably ignorant so you'd have to elaborate more on that to |
| 8 |
> > make me see a problem there. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> think about it a little bit. your system is using static binaries |
| 11 |
> right now, and considering you like to push systemd + initramfs so |
| 12 |
> much, i would have thought you'd realize the implications more |
| 13 |
> quickly. -mike |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Hm, I seem to fail to notice other static binaries than busybox. And I |
| 16 |
don't think I use any specific configuration which makes me need static |
| 17 |
binaries; I'm following the _original_ *nix idea of keeping it simple. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Best regards, |
| 21 |
Michał Górny |
Archives