1 |
On Sunday 04 December 2011 15:35:50 Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
2 |
> Since there are quite a few packages that would need updates, I thought |
3 |
> about first mailing gentoo-dev for feedback and perhaps a first chunk of |
4 |
> work done. I also wouldn't mind creating bugreports for each of them, but |
5 |
> that would still be best done after having mailed gentoo-dev ;-) |
6 |
|
7 |
i generally don't want to see bug reports that say "please add IUSE=selinux to |
8 |
XXX package and add 'selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-XXX )' to *DEPEND". if |
9 |
selinux wants policies pulled in by packages based on USE=selinux, and that's |
10 |
the only change needed, then feel free to commit the change yourself for any |
11 |
toolchain / base-system / vapier package. probably easiest to skip the |
12 |
revbump and just commit to existing packages since selinux has been deadish |
13 |
for quite sometime :P. |
14 |
|
15 |
> games-board/aisleriot sec-policy/selinux-games |
16 |
|
17 |
i don't see why this game is singled out. if you have a selinux policy for |
18 |
all games, then it sounds like we should add this logic to games.eclass. |
19 |
|
20 |
> net-im/climm sec-policy/selinux-games |
21 |
|
22 |
you sure about that one ? this isn't a game (unless you count all forms of IM |
23 |
a "game" :p). |
24 |
|
25 |
and yes, this list really really should have been sent through `sort` |
26 |
-mike |