1 |
2008-07-27 00:00:55 Carsten Lohrke napisał(a): |
2 |
> On Samstag, 26. Juli 2008, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: |
3 |
> > > Um, this already is the policy. We've always fixed bug reports about |
4 |
> > > LDFLAGS being ignored. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Mark Loeser (Halcy0n) (QA project leader) said on 2008-07-24 that this |
7 |
> > policy doesn't exist. I understand that bug reports about LDFLAGS being |
8 |
> > ignored are usually fixed, so I ask for the formal enacting of this policy. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Afaik it has always been the way that *sane* LDFLAGS are to be respected, but |
11 |
> exceptions exist of course and it's up to the maintainer to mangle or clear |
12 |
> your LDFLAGS, if deemed necessary. I'd like to know, why Mark asked to bring |
13 |
> this question up here. Shouldn't this be common sense!? |
14 |
|
15 |
+1. |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |