Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jay Maynard <jmaynard@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] yet another virtual question
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:14:49
Message-Id: 20040327122010.GB3622@thebrain.conmicro.cx
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] yet another virtual question by Daniel Armyr
1 On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:08:02AM +0100, Daniel Armyr wrote:
2 > > But but but ... who doesn't like bash?
3 > We exist. Not many of us, but we do exist. At this time it is very
4 > dificult to administer Gentoo without resorting to bash as a shell. At
5 > times quite frequently. This means users have less sof a choice. This is
6 > often in GentooLand considdered a "bad thing".
7
8 Do you want to use another sh-compatible shell, or do you want to use a
9 csh-compatible shell? The former should be achievable, if only with a lot of
10 work. (Scripts should be written in portable sh, using no bash-specific
11 features.) The latter is effectively impossible, as it would require
12 maintaining both sh and csh scripts - and script programming in csh is
13 widely regarded as a Bad Idea. (There's a famous paper out there about why
14 you should not treat csh as a programming language.)
15
16 --
17 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list