Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 19:31:16 +0000
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@...> wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 20:17:41 +0100
> Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
> > In one of them, removal of the old assignment statement had simply
> > been forgotten [1]. For the other two, the EAPI had been assigned by
> > an eclass [2], which we consider illegal anyway.
>
> ...and yet people do it. That and the violations of the HOMEPAGE rule
> tell you a lot about what happens when something is made syntactically
> valid but supposedly not legal.
>
... and this is where repoman helps.
broken deps are syntactically valid but not legal either.
|
|
