Michał Górny писал 2012-05-31 23:33:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012 14:18:04 -0500
> William Hubbs <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 01:48:29PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Robin H. Johnson
>> > <email@example.com> wrote:
>> > > 1.
>> > > Discussion on merge policy. Originally I thought we would
>> > > disallow merge commits, so that we would get a cleaner history.
>> > > However, it turns out that if the repo ends up being pushed to
>> > > different places with slightly different histories, merges are
>> > > absolutely going to be required to prevent somebody from having
>> > > to rebase at least one of their sets of commits that are already
>> > > pushed.
>> > Not sure I'm following, but I will be the first to admit that I'm
>> > git novice. Would this be aided by a convention, like only
>> > committing to master on the gentoo official repository, and any
>> > on-the-side work on places like github/etc stays in branches?
>> > Those repositories would just keep getting fed commits on master
>> > from the official repository.
>> Iagree with this; I think we should ban merge commits on master.
>> would force everyone to rebase their work on current master before
>> they commit to master which would make the history clean.
> What would git signing work with rebased commits? Would all of them
> have to be signed once again?
Commits itsels still will be signed
Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov
Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, NRC Kurchatov Institute,
Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics
Gentoo Team Ru
Gentoo Linux Dev