Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
Subject: Re: system set no longer in part of world set
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:20:03 -0600

 1.1

On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:13:01 -0600
Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote:

> Just curious, what are the benefits of not having world include
> system?

Nevermind, I just found your post explaining this.

-- 
gcc-porting,                                      by design, by neglect
treecleaner,                              for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo     EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
References:
system set no longer in part of world set
-- Doug Goldstein
Re: system set no longer in part of world set
-- Ryan Hill
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: system set no longer in part of world set
Next by thread:
RFC: auto-detection of unpack dependencies
Previous by date:
Re: system set no longer in part of world set
Next by date:
Re: strange portage behaviour


Oct 12, 2008

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.