| 1 |
On 15:45 Sat 12 Mar , Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 |
> I actually use the fact that these are still open to judge whether a |
| 3 |
> package has to be removed from the tree, closing them would definitely |
| 4 |
> be a bad idea for two reasons: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I'm assuming you're talking only about broken builds here and not |
| 7 |
"QA-only" bugs. My opinion is that if a tinderbox QA script is the only |
| 8 |
thing finding a nonfatal bug, and it's never reported or CC'd by a user, |
| 9 |
then it's about as low priority as you can get. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
So this might serve as a pointer to potentially unmaintained packages, |
| 12 |
but clearly more investigation is required before removal. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Thanks, |
| 16 |
Donnie |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Donnie Berkholz |
| 19 |
Sr. Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 20 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.com |
Archives