On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Hans de Graaff <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 10:00 +0200, Corentin Chary wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Hans de Graaff <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> > One integration that might also be useful is what we track on the ruby
>> > wiki currently: https://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/ruby/wiki/PendingBumps
>> > which is a collection of quick notes on problems encountered while
>> > bumping packages. The ability to attach notes to packages and to
>> > acknowledge version bumps (and e.g. make them yellow instead of red)
>> > could help with larger lists for herds.
>> You can already use that page: http://euscan.iksaif.net/herds/ruby/
> I think you missed my point. This page is more like what we have at
> http://moving-innovations.com/~graaff/outdated-gems/ which is an
> automated list based on what is in the tree and upstream. Your page is a
> good replacement for that so we may just use that in the future.
> What our wiki page does it keep *notes* on these bumps, so all of that
> relies on manual input. (e.g. "we tried to bump this but it needs a new
> dependency that we don't have yet.") The euscan page doesn't support
> that yet. Arguably I should open bugs for each of these bumps, but that
> seems like a lot of overhead for some quick notes.
Right, having a stable API and a special euscan tag on the wiki could