Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 02:59:58
Message-Id: h6nmu9$v9i$1@ger.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay by Sebastian Pipping
1 On 08/22/2009 05:39 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
2 > Sebastian Pipping wrote:
3 >> Commits are done automatically, triggering and pushing is
4 >> manual at the moment.
5 >
6 > By now a cron-based setup is running syncing the pure-funtoo overlay
7 > (and therefore also its atom and rss feeds) every 24 hours.
8
9 There seems to be a bit of (minimal) duplication between pure-funtoo and
10 sunrise:
11
12 app-office/thinking-rock-bin
13 dev-tex/mimetex
14 x11-drivers/xf86-video-nouveau
15
16 And since sunrise is the most popular overlay, it might be a good idea
17 to also omit packages found in sunrise.

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay Sebastian Pipping <webmaster@××××××××.org>