| 1 |
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 19:08:09 Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
> Making it overridable seems wiser- |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> usex() { |
| 5 |
> local flag="$1" |
| 6 |
> local tval=${2-yes} |
| 7 |
> local fval=${3-no} |
| 8 |
> if use $flag; then |
| 9 |
> echo "${tval}" |
| 10 |
> else |
| 11 |
> echo "${fval}" |
| 12 |
> fi |
| 13 |
> } |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
i dont get it. mine already does exactly this, just in one line. |
| 16 |
usex() { use $1 && echo ${2:-yes} || echo ${3:-no} ; } |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> While a bit longer, we likely can gut most of the use_* logic to |
| 19 |
> use that, and it makes it easier to deal w/ the situations where a |
| 20 |
> configure's options always assume --enable-blah thus don't export the |
| 21 |
> option, but *do* export a --disable-blah. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
yeah, i thought about replacing use_{with,enable} with usex, but we'd have to |
| 24 |
extend usex() a little bit more |
| 25 |
-mike |
Archives