| 1 |
On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 20:06 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> This topic has come up in the past, and I'd like to revive it once |
| 3 |
> again. The gentoo-dev list has gotten a lower and lower signal to noise |
| 4 |
> ratio over the past year or two, and it's difficult to dig out the stuff |
| 5 |
> that's truly required reading. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I propose that all need-to-know announcements and decisions be posted to |
| 8 |
> a separate, moderated (or restricted posting) gentoo-dev-announce list |
| 9 |
> to ensure that no developers lose track of what really matters. |
| 10 |
> Hopefully, this will also help to give more focus to discussions on |
| 11 |
> gentoo-dev because the goal will be to get a real decision to send to |
| 12 |
> gentoo-dev-announce. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I would be in favor of a gentoo-dev-announce list if it allowed me |
| 16 |
to unsubscribe from this list. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 20 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives